Monday, March 4, 2013

Other tips on IGCSE History skills for Paper 2



Other tips on IGCSE History skills for Paper 2:

20th century core

For the May/June 2013 examination the selected topic for Paper 2 is Topic 1: Were the Peace Treaties of 1919–23 fair?

For the October/November 2013 examination the selected topic for Paper 2 is is Topic 5: How effectively did the USA contain the spread of Communism?

  • First read the question(s)
  • Then read ALL sources
  • Use info from source, but also background knowledge. Answers should focus on the sources supported by knowledge of the bigger picture.
  • Always support an answer with examples and explanations.
  • Avoid too much knowledge. IT IS ALL ABOUT THE SOURCES AND WHAT THEY MEAN! The examiner is looking for evidence of the use of sources supported by contextual knowledge. Be concise and relevant.
  • There are no “right” answers – only well-supported opinions!!!
  • However, DO NOT rewrite the source! The examiner is very familiar with it and expects you to interpret it or to use it in order to answer the specific question regarding the source.
  • Take the questions in order – using the sources as directed.
  • Allow twice as many minutes for each question as there are marks for that question, i.e. allow at least 16 minutes for an 8 mark answer.
  • Focus on what is being asked (or suggested).
  • Always refer to the ‘source’ of the source, e.g. “A cartoon from a German newspaper of September 1939”, or  “A speech made in Parliament by Winston Churchill”. Refer to bias, propaganda, self interest, etc. This is called the provenance of the source. ALSO mention the relevance of the provenance to the meaning/message/intention of the source.
  • Repeat info if necessary: if information is relevant to two questions write it down twice.
  • Other sources on the Paper, not mentioned in the question, can be used if they contribute to a better answer.
  •  Refer to sources by stating “According to Source C …” or “From Source A it is clear that …”or “Source B mentions…”. Never write an answer to a question without mentioning the source/s that is/are being referred to.
  • The last question involves all the sources: take them one by one and formulate an all-inclusive answer to the specific question. The sources used will support two different viewpoints or ‘sit on the fence’. Ensure that the different viewpoints are explained and show how they are supported by the sources. The conclusion reached should be based on the evidence given. This should come at the end.
  •  A simple chart might help:

Sources SUPPORTING
Sources AGAINST
Sources that DO NEITHER
A
E
C
D
B
F


G


  1. You can also use high lighters or symbols to indicate the three groups.
  2. Try finding other cartoons from the relevant time on the Internet; interpret them and make sure you know who the main role players are, places, circumstances events preceding that event, what the specific references are.
  3. For example, source A and source D agree on the fact that ….  You may quote short parts to substantiate the point  Or:  Both source B and source E prove the opposite, (explain what you mean) while sources C, F and G do not support the view that …
  4. REMEMBER: you are asked to answer ONE main question. Make sure you keep this question in mind while working through the sources. The sources are to be USED as tools to answer that specific question.
  5. AND FINALLY, THE DRAGON:     THE LAST QUESTION

This is the only question that does not change, so it’s the one you can prepare for best of all. The good news is, it’s also worth the most marks! Typically, you will be given a statement and asked to make a comment about it. For example, How far do these sources show that Britain and France were to blame for the Anschluss? Explain your answer:

  • Firstly, work out which sources support the statement and which ones don’t AND which sources do neither.
  • Secondly, plan to write a balanced answer which clearly addresses both sides of the question.
  • Next, simply evaluate the sources and back up your opinions using contextual knowledge.
  • Finally, remember to answer the question at the end! In this case, for example, you could say that Britain and France were not to blame, partly to blame, mostly to blame, or totally to blame for the Anschluss, e.g.


Sources which support the statement
Sources which don’t support the statement
Sources that do neither
G, H, I, J
A, C, D, E, F
B

*  The basic rule for this question is that you must always make specific reference to the sources in your answer. That means saying things like ‘Source A supports the statement because …’ and ‘I can trust Source B because …’ Use your contextual knowledge to back up your opinions about the sources and also to fill in the gaps in the story: e.g.:
The sources don’t mention that Britain and France led the League of Nations, which in turn was responsible for upholding the terms of the Treaty of Versailles – and which had forbidden the Anschluss in the first place! 

*Top tip - There are two bonus marks available in this last question for assessing or reassessing the RELIABILITY of some of the sources you are considering! Every year more students lose marks on this part of the paper than any other.

Cartoons
  •  Key role players
  • Who says what to whom?
  •  Why?
  • When? Exact date is important – specific circumstances
  •  Facial expression / body language / emotion
  •  Metaphor / images / puns / figures of speech
  • Propaganda
  • Other questions


32 comments:

  1. so for paper 2 do we study CUBA?

    ReplyDelete
  2. For IGCSE History, 20th Century option, the focus area for the source-based Paper 2 in the October/November 2013 examination will be:
    Focus Points
    5.1. This Key Question will be explored through case studies of the following:
     America and events in Cuba, 1959 – 62;
     American involvement in Vietnam.

    Specified Content
    Events of the Cold War:
     case studies of American reactions to the Cuban revolution,
     including the missile crisis and its aftermath, and
     American involvement in the Vietnam War.

    Please study that part of the work in GREAT detail, as the source based paper is a tricky one. Use alternative sources to find speeches, cartoons, statistics, tactics, attitudes and events from that time. Fortunately there are many available, e.g. google “IGCSE History” + “USA +containment+ Communism”? or use a combination of key words, e.g. “Containment of Communism”+ “USA”. http://www.activehistory.co.uk/ l SchoolHistory | Spartacus | JohnDClare | SchoolsHistory | BBC History | History Channel UK www.learn.co.uk , www.bbc.co.uk and www.thehistorychannel.co.uk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you
      im also writing that option next week

      but there is a part i don't think you answered or i understood
      am i to study CUBA only Or VIETNAM only OR Both as no one knows whats going to come

      & what about KOREA

      Delete
    2. Both Cuba and Vietnam, because nobody knows what it is.

      Korea will not be in the exam.

      Delete
    3. Daisy, read Focus Point 5.1 again:
      Focus Points
      5.1. This Key Question will be explored through case studies of the following:
       America and events in Cuba, 1959 – 62;
       American involvement in Vietnam.

      Specified Content
      Events of the Cold War:
       case studies of American reactions to the Cuban revolution,
       including the missile crisis and its aftermath, and
       American involvement in the Vietnam War.

      The source-based question will come from these case studies, but exactly which one, only the examiner knows!

      Delete
  3. Does the length of the answer have any effect on the marks awarded? All my classmates are saying that a minimum of two pages is required for the 12 mark answer, but I am not completely sure. Appearing for the exam tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The length of an answer does not determine its success; it is the substance, appropriate contents and skill with which the question is approached that will guarantee success! Use the tips that are discussed above, read everything you have or can find on the internet on source work, compose the best answer answer you are capable of, and see how long your answer is. Concise, applicable answers employing the correct approach and well-founded facts are preferred. Make sure you plan your answer well and keep an eye on the clock! Good luck.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Do you know what the topic is for the May/June 2014 exam is please?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isabel
      If you study Option B: 20th century, then the topics for 2014 are:
      20th century core:

      Topic 5: How effectively did the USA contain the spread of Communism? (May/June examination)

      or

      Topic 3: Why had international peace collapse by 1939? (November examination)

      I hope this helps!

      Delete
  6. Thank you very much! This is so helpful!

    ReplyDelete
  7. And what about OCT/NOV 2015 EXAMS will be on which topic/,, tnx

    ReplyDelete
  8. HI could you let me know what the topic will be for the May/June exams of 2015? I am studying Option B

    ReplyDelete
  9. For Paper 2 the source-based topics for Option B (20th century) 2015 are:

    Topic 3: Causes of the First World War and why international peace collapsed in 1939. (May/June examination)

    Topic 4: Causes of the Cold War. (October/November examination)

    All IGCSE History students should take note of the new format of Paper 4 DEPTH STUDY
    Candidates are required to answer one, non-structured (essay) question from a choice of two on their chosen Depth Study. Please study Walsh (2013), p. 319 for valuable information on how to answer Paper 4 questions (and of course the assignments based on Paper 4):

    Written paper alternative to coursework:
    Focus
    In this paper you will be focusing on whichever Depth study you have followed. There will be two questions and you have to choose one of them. The question will ask you to make a judgement on how important or significant a particular event, person, group or development was. So you need to practise thinking about questions such as:
    • How important was propaganda in maintaining Nazi control of Germany 1933 – 39?

    Your aims
    A good answer to these questions will need to do the following things:
    • Make a strong case that X (your given event, person or group) was or was not significant. You should aim to make a strong argument that focuses mainly on X.
    • Support your argument by selecting relevant events and developments and explain how these events support the argument you are making.
    • Show you are aware of other factors that you think are more/less significant than X. You should:
     Explain why you think they are more or less significant that X.
     Explain how they might be connected to X – how X and the other factors are interrelated (e.g. it could be that other factors created problems that gave an advantage to X).
    • Produce a well-argued conclusion that sets out your view on the significance of X. This does not mean summarising the essay you have just written. It means saying that overall you think X was/was not the most significant factor and the reasoning which brought you to that conclusion (e.g. none of the other factors could have happened without X, or all the
    leading historians seem to argue X was not significant).

    A possible approach
    The important thing is to make up your mind on your key argument and then use the rest of your research to support it. To help you think through the issue and reach a conclusion you could use a table like this.

    QUESTION
    … X was significant because: This mattered because:
    Reason 1
    Reason 2
    Reason 3



    QUESTION
    Other significant factors that This mattered because … More/less important than
    played a part include … X because …
    Factor 1
    Factor 2
    Factor 3


    See the example on p. 319 of Walsh (2015).
    And remember …
    Significance or importance is difficult to assess. These ideas might help you as you plan your argument.
    • Did X bring change in the way people acted?
    • Did X change people’s ideas or beliefs?
    • Did X force authorities (governments, monarchs, police forces, etc.) to change?
    • Was the impact of X long lasting or short term?
    • Did X have a major impact on people’s lives? How many lives? For how long?
    • If you remove X how far do you think events would have been different?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks, this is really helpful. Is this structure also valid for the AS level paper 1 source question? I'm really battling to figure out what is required, both in structure and content. My knowledge base is good, it is a matter of understanding what the examiner wants to see, and I always seem to put in too much context, or too little... I would appreciate any help you can give me!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I strongly recommend the book by Phil Wadsworth, International History 1871-1945 published in 2013 by Cambridge University Press. It contains an excellent discussion of examination skills for both Paper 1 and Paper 2.

      Delete
  11. Please assist our Learners with clear instructions on how to answer the differerent source based question on Paper 2. R U Tjazapi from Opuwo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For Paper 2 the source-based topics for Option B (20th century) 2015 are:

      Topic 4: Causes of the Cold War. (October/November examination)

      Excellent help is available at
      http://www.mrallsophistory.com/revision/succeeding-at-sourcework-exam-tips.html

      Good luck!

      Delete
    2. For Paper 2 the source-based topics for Option B (20th century) 2015 are:

      Topic 4: Causes of the Cold War. (October/November examination)

      Excellent help is available at
      http://www.mrallsophistory.com/revision/succeeding-at-sourcework-exam-tips.html

      Good luck!

      Delete
  12. I am a Secondary School History educator and would like to be assisted with source material on the German Depth study 1918-45.I would also appreciate it very much if you can provide explanation on how to help learner to answers these type of questions. Mr Richard Urikee Tjazapi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Ricahard

      https://www.youtube.com/user/mrallsop
      This website is highly recommended for IGCSE History as it provides very interesting podcasts on all the topics.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/history/mwh/germany/
      Excellent for revision

      Also study the following article:

      (Walsh, Ben. 2013. Modern World History, Option B: The 20th century. Hodder Education)

      All IGCSE History students should take note of the new format of Paper 4 DEPTH STUDY
      Candidates are required to answer one, non-structured (essay) question from a choice of two on their chosen Depth Study. Please study Walsh (2013), p. 319 for valuable information on how to answer Paper 4 questions (and of course the assignments based on Paper 4):

      Written paper alternative to coursework (Paper 4)
      Focus
      In this paper you will be focusing on whichever Depth study you have followed. There will be two questions and you have to choose one of them. The question will ask you to make a judgement on how important or significant a particular event, person, group or development was. So you need to practise thinking about questions such as:
      • How important was propaganda in maintaining Nazi control of Germany 1933 – 39?

      Your aims
      A good answer to these questions will need to do the following things:
      • Make a strong case that X (your given event, person or group) was or was not significant. You should aim to make a strong argument that focuses mainly on X.
      • Support your argument by selecting relevant events and developments and explain how these events support the argument you are making.
      • Show you are aware of other factors that you think are more/less significant than X. You should:
       Explain why you think they are more or less significant that X.
       Explain how they might be connected to X – how X and the other factors are interrelated (e.g. it could be that other factors created problems that gave an advantage to X).
      • Produce a well-argued conclusion that sets out your view on the significance of X. This does not mean summarising the essay you have just written. It means saying that overall you think X was/was not the most significant factor and the reasoning which brought you to that conclusion (e.g. none of the other factors could have happened without X, or all the
      leading historians seem to argue X was not significant).

      A possible approach
      The important thing is to make up your mind on your key argument and then use the rest of your research to support it. To help you think through the issue and reach a conclusion you could use a table like this.

      QUESTION
      … X was significant because: This mattered because:
      Reason 1
      Reason 2
      Reason 3



      QUESTION
      Other significant factors that This mattered because … More/less important than
      played a part include … X because …
      Factor 1
      Factor 2
      Factor 3


      See the example on p. 319 of Walsh (2015).
      And remember …
      Significance or importance is difficult to assess. These ideas might help you as you plan your argument.
      • Did X bring change in the way people acted?
      • Did X change people’s ideas or beliefs?
      • Did X force authorities (governments, monarchs, police forces, etc.) to change?
      • Was the impact of X long lasting or short term?
      • Did X have a major impact on people’s lives? How many lives? For how long?
      • If you remove X how far do you think events would have been different?

      I hope this helps!

      Delete
  13. Hello,
    Can you please explain how do i prepare for paper 2.
    I'll be on cloud 9 if you'll reply me fast cuz tomorrow is my igcse paper. I am totally confused. what all do i refer to? how to write answers of paper 2? Inspite of knowing dat its all about the sources and a quite are onw knowledge, I still have no idea how to attempt the questions. pls. pls. pls. help me.
    The topics is: the cold war
    harshita.15ranjan@gmail.com is my id.
    Afet reading those above messages I've really got confidence that there exist someone who can help!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. n yea... wha basically i do now?

      Delete
  14. Pls read it
    A few hours are only left

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete


  16. You can't believe what i just got,… A loan of $ 60,000. I have been looking for a loan for the past 2years until i was referred to a legitimate lender. Though it was not that easy to approve my loan, as you know nothing good comes easy. But I got my loan within 4 hours i got my loan, and before i knew it, the loan was transferred to me. please friends, don't let any body deceive you and scam you for this is real. Contact them via Email: gaincreditloan1@gmail.com OR You can also whatsApp them at: at +1-(901)676-0641 (WhatsApp Only)

    ReplyDelete